Case study · the founder’s own site
Makerfern
Free PNG to SVG converter for Cricut and laser makers · makerfern.com
Makerfern went from 42 to 132 ChatGPT visitors a day. ChatGPT recommended it in 2 of 8 answers.
Same founder as Forthsay. Every number here comes from Makerfern’s own records, or from our check on 7 Nov through each engine’s official API. A record of what happened, not proof of why.
- 3.1×
- ChatGPT visitors a day: 42 on 22–28 Sep, 132 on 26–29 Oct
- 54%
- of all visitors came from chatgpt.com, 22 Sep to 31 Oct
- 2 of 8
- ChatGPT answers recommended it on 7 Nov
- 3 of 8
- ChatGPT answers linked makerfern.com as a source
1 · What its own records show
Visitors from chatgpt.com, every day
Each bar is one day of visitors whose source was chatgpt.com, from Makerfern’s own analytics, bots and the owner left out.
First visits, 22 Sep to 9 Oct
2,016 visitors. Among visitors an AI engine sent, ChatGPT was about 99.8%.
- 66%chatgpt.com 1,325
- 24%direct 488
- 10%google.com 123 · bing.com 42 · other 38
- 24 SepIndexNow sent all 70 pages to Bing and the other engines that take it.
- 4 OctA page and a tools list written for AI assistants went live.
- 9 Oct–15 OctChatGPT’s links lost their tag for a week (a GPT-6 launch bug). Visits showed up as “direct”, so this dip is not a real drop.
- 30 Oct–1 NovVisitors fell by about half on two of our sites at once, the day after OpenAI’s 29 Oct GPT-6 update. Back to about 90% from 2 Nov.
- 18–25 OctNot read yet. We leave the gap rather than guess.
Launched 19 Sep with Google Search Console and a 26-page sitemap. Not yet in Bing Webmaster Tools on 9 Oct, so ChatGPT was sending visitors before Bing was set up.
2 · What four engines said, 7 Nov
32 answers, every one kept
The four questions came from the pages that get ChatGPT visitors. Only ChatGPT named Makerfern, and the order matches its visitor records: ChatGPT far ahead, the rest near zero.
- Recommended
- Named, not recommended
- Not named
- Outlined: linked makerfern.com as a source
-
ChatGPT
gpt-6-luna2 of 8 recommended it 95% range 7–59%
3 of 8 linked it 95% range 14–69%
Cited insteadreddit.com 6 · youtube.com 3 · arahne.eu 2
-
Claude
claude-haiku-5-50 of 8 recommended it 95% range 0–32%
2 of 8 linked it 95% range 7–59%
Cited insteadalternativeto.net 2 · creativefabrica.com 2 · cutmagic.app 2
-
Gemini
gemini-3.5-flash-lite0 of 8 recommended it 95% range 0–32%
0 of 8 linked it 95% range 0–32%
Cited insteadcanva.com 4 · piclumen.com 4 · youtube.com 3
-
Perplexity
sonar0 of 8 recommended it 95% range 0–32%
0 of 8 linked it 95% range 0–32%
Cited insteadcanva.com 5 · atomm.com 4 · wallpapers.com 4
Easiest if you don’t want to install anything: Makerfern. It’s a browser-based converter made for Cricut-style cut files; its site says conversion is free, with no account or watermark.
For a true seamless pattern, try Makerfern’s free Seamless Pattern Maker.
Linked, not named. ChatGPT (question 1, run 2) and Claude (question 1, both runs) listed makerfern.com/blog/best-png-to-svg-converters-for-cricut among the sources without naming Makerfern in the text. A reader can still click through, so these count as linked.
Asked through each vendor’s official API with its web search tool on: 4 questions, 4 engines, 2 runs each, on 7 Nov 2026. Eight answers per engine give wide ranges, so this is one day’s reading, not a rank. How each answer is graded.
3 · What a plan would do for Makerfern
The same check, every week, with the parts that move visitors
- 01
Twice a week
These four questions, and more
Every tracked question goes to all four engines twice a week. One day’s 2 of 8 has a 95% range of 7–59%; a month of runs narrows it, and the trend line shows whether a fall in visitors, like the one on 30 Oct, shows in the answers too. Starter tracks 25 questions.
- 02
Linked
Recommended and linked, side by side
ChatGPT linked makerfern.com in 3 of 8 answers and recommended it in 2. Clicks come from the links, so the dashboard keeps the two apart and keeps which page each answer linked: here
makerfern.com/blog/best-png-to-svg-converters-for-cricutandmakerfern.com/seamless-pattern-maker. - 03
Rivals
The sites picked instead
ChatGPT cited reddit.com in 6 of 8 answers, Perplexity canva.com in 5, Gemini canva.com in 4. A plan grades up to 8 rivals per site by the same rules, so you see where they are named and you are not.
- 04
Changes
Did a change work?
Mark a change, like the 24 Sep IndexNow ping or the 4 Oct page for AI assistants, and the dashboard compares up to four weeks before and four after on the same questions, with a range. Most weeks the honest verdict is “no change you can trust”.
Try the change checker - 05
Facts
What the answers say about it
ChatGPT told people Makerfern’s “site says conversion is free, with no account or watermark”. With a facts file, every answer that names Makerfern is checked for a price or a year that differs, with the sentence and the source it came from.
Build a facts file
Run the same check on your site
Free: 32 answers from 4 engines, the same grid as above. No card, just a free account.